Technological characteristics and stressors leading to behavioral strains associated with technostress among youth in Kenya
Keywords:
Stress, Stressors, Strain, Outcomes, Epidemiology, Information and Communication Technologies and TechnostressAbstract
The development and advancement of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Kenya has profoundly impacted people’s lives, affecting how they work, communicate and even interact. The evolution of technology and the popularization of different devices and applications have led to rapid changes in the exposure profiles of the population at work, school, home and leisure in just a few decades. It is, therefore, important to examine the potential health effects of this exposure. This paper focuses on the possible negative impact of ICT use on young adults in Kenya. A literature review suggests that technology characteristics such as ease of use, complexity of use, constant connectivity, anonymity, mobility, and dynamism contribute significantly to creating behavioural stress that leads to technostress. Data were collected through a questionnaire from a sample of 112 students aged 18-30 years in eight institutions in Kenya. A correlation analysis was then conducted using SPSS quantitative analysis software. The results show that stressors such as work intensification and overload, information overload, technological invasion, technological complexity, technological uncertainty and conflicts between work, society, home or school are also contributing factors in creating behavioural tensions associated with technostress among ICT users. Furthermore, behavioural tensions associated with technostress are prevalent. The findings of this study have implications for both research and practice. It opens up further avenues of research by showing that ICT is a growing source of technostress in developing countries like Kenya. The study also mentions several inhibitors that can be further explored as possible remedial measures for technostress.
References
[1] M. Kami, K. Kampus, and K. Lumpur, “Universiti Putra Malaysia Universiti Putra Malaysia,” Factors Influ. Contin. Intent. Towar. on- Demand Ridesharing Serv., no. M, pp. 2–3, 2013.
[2] C. Bernard, S. Wolf, and H. Copley Greene, An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine, vol. 400. Courier Corporation, 2018. doi: 10.4324/9781351320764-1.
[3] N. Schneiderman, G. Ironson, and S. D. Siegel, “Stress and health: Psychological, behavioral, and biological determinants,” Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol., vol. 1, no. Lacey 1967, pp. 607–628, 2005, doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144141.
[4] G. Westlander, “Technostress - the Human Cost of the Computer Revolution - Swedish - Brod,C,” Nord. Psykol., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 416–420, 1988.
[5] K. Pflügner, J. Mattke, and C. Maier, “Who is Stressed by Using ICTs ? A Qualitative Comparison Analysis with the Big Five Personality Traits to Understand Technostress,” in International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Siegen, 2019, pp. 1175–1189.
[6] R. Ayyagari, “What and why of technostress: Technology antecedents and implications,” Clemson University, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/133
[7] E. Gustafsson, Physical exposure , musculoskeletal symptoms and attitudes related to ICT use, vol. 43. Institute of Medicine. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, 2009.
[8] R. Ayyagari, V. Grover, and R. Purvis, “Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications,” MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 831–858, 2011, doi: 10.2307/41409963.
[9] M. Tarafdar, C. L. Cooper, and J. F. Stich, “The technostress trifecta ‐ techno eustress , techno distress and design : Theoretical directions and an agenda for research,” Inf. Syst. J., vol. 29, no. September 2017, pp. 6–42, 2019, doi: 10.1111/isj.12169.
[10] C. Weinert, M. Christian, S. Laumer, and T. Weitzel, “How do Users Respond to Technostress ? An Empirical Analysis of Proactive and Reactive Coping,” in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui: Association for Information Systems, 2019, pp. 5103–5112. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/10125/59947
[11] Z. Yan, X. Guo, M. K. O. Lee, and D. R. Vogel, “A conceptual model of technology features and technostress in telemedicine communication,” Inf. Technol. People, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 283–297, 2013, doi: 10.1108/ITP-04-2013-0071.
[12] G. Concilio, G. Costa, M. Karimi, M. V. Del Olmo, and O. Kehagia, “Co-Designing with Migrants’ Easier Access to Public Services: A Technological Perspective,” Soc. Sci., vol. 11, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.3390/socsci11020054.
[13] M. Molino et al., “Wellbeing costs of technology use during Covid-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 15, p. 5911, 2020.
[14] A. B. Soro, P. Whyte, D. J. Bolton, and B. K. Tiwari, “Strategies and novel technologies to control Campylobacter in the poultry chain: A review,” Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1353–1377, 2020.
[15] H. Yang et al., “Workplace psychosocial and organizational factors for neck pain in workers in the United States,” Am. J. Ind. Med., vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 549–560, 2016.
[16] S. Lutz, F. M. Schneider, and P. Vorderer, “On the downside of mobile communication: An experimental study about the influence of setting-inconsistent pressure on employees’ emotional well-being,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 105, p. 106216, 2020.
[17] Q. Yuan, J. Kong, C. Liu, and Y. Jiang, “Understanding the effects of specific techno-stressors on strain and job performance: a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence,” Inf. Technol. & People, 2023.
[18] C. Joling and K. Kraan, “Use of technology and working conditions in the European Union,” p. 55, 2008.
[19] K. A. Van Orden et al., “Strategies to Promote Social Connections Among Older Adults During ‘Social Distancing’ Restrictions,” Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.05.004.
[20] A. Costantini and E. Mazzotti, “Italian validation of CoViD-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index and preliminary data in a sample of general population,” Riv. Psichiatr., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 145–151, 2020, doi: 10.1708/3382.33570.
[21] P. Iosifidis, M. Wheeler, P. Iosifidis, and M. Wheeler, “Social Media, Public Sphere and Democracy,” Public Spheres Mediat. Soc. Networks West. Context Beyond, pp. 13–37, 2016.
[22] C.-F. Liu, T.-J. Cheng, and C.-T. Chen, “Exploring the factors that influence physician technostress from using mobile electronic medical records,” Informatics Heal. Soc. care, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 92–104, 2019.
[23] D. Hefner and P. Vorderer, “Digital stress: Permanent connectedness and multitasking,” in The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being, Routledge, 2016, pp. 237–249.
[24] M. Richtel, “Attached to Technology and Paying a Price,” New York Times, vol. 6,
pp. 1–10, 2010, [Online]. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/07/technology/07brain.html%5Cnhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/07/technology/07brain.html?pagewanted=all
[25] S. Brooks and C. Califf, “Social media-induced technostress: Its impact on the job performance of it professionals and the moderating role of job characteristics,” Comput. networks, vol. 114, pp. 143–153, 2017.
[26] K. N. Hampton, W. Lu, and I. Shin, “Digital media and stress: The cost of caring 2.0,” Information, Commun. & Soc., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1267–1286, 2016.
[27] A. Giudice et al., “Can teledentistry improve the monitoring of patients during the Covid-19 dissemination? A descriptive pilot study,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1–9, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103399.
[28] N. Scheiner, “An interpretative phenomenological analysis
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
upon requestIssue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The AJDI's policy is to publish a fully open-access journal. According to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), this journal is published online in an Open Access format, which fulfils the DOAJ definition of open access.
Users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, crawl for indexing or link to the full texts of the articles or use them for any other lawful purpose without asking the publisher's or the author's prior permission. Open Access applies to future and all past issues of the journal. Authors who submit their articles for publication must be aware and comfortable that all articles will be made available on the internet to all users worldwide as soon as they are published. It is acknowledged that all material will be available for commercial and non-commercial use and distribution in all mediums as long as the author and journal are properly credited.
The advantages of open access for authors include increased visibility and exposure and free access worldwide to users.
Open Access applies to future and all past issues of the journal. Authors retain copyright and full publication rights.
